Information Technology
The Art of Agile Development
Agile development is popular. All the cool kids are doing it: Google, Yahoo, Symantec, Microsoft, and the list goes on.* I know of one company that has already changed its name to Agili-something in order to ride the bandwagon. (They called me in to pitch their “agile process,” which, upon further inspection, was nothing more than outsourced offshore development, done in a different country than usual.) I fully expect the big consulting companies to start offering Certified Agile Processes and Certified Agile Consultants—for astronomical fees, of course—any day now. Please don’t get sucked into that mess. In 1986, [Brooks] famously predicted that there were no silver bullets: that by 1996, no single technology or management technique would offer a tenfold increase in productivity, reliability, or simplicity. None did. Agile development isn’t a silver bullet, either. In fact, I don’t recommend adopting agile development solely to increase productivity. Its benefits— even the ability to release software more frequently—come from working differently, not from working faster. Although anecdotal evidence indicates that agile teams have above-average productivity,† that shouldn’t be your primary motivation. Your team will need time to learn agile development. While they learn—and it will take a quarter or two—they’ll go slower, not faster. In addition, emphasizing productivity might encourage your team to take shortcuts and to be less rigorous in their work, which could actually harm productivity. Agile development may be the cool thing to do right now, but that’s no reason to use it. When you consider using agile development, only one question matters.
Availability
No copy data
Detail Information
- Series Title
-
-
- Call Number
-
-
- Publisher
- : ., 2008
- Collation
-
1-432
- Language
-
English
- ISBN/ISSN
-
978-0-596-52767-9
- Classification
-
NONE
- Content Type
-
-
- Media Type
-
-
- Carrier Type
-
-
- Edition
-
-
- Subject(s)
- Specific Detail Info
-
-
- Statement of Responsibility
-
-
Other version/related
No other version available
File Attachment
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment
Computer Science, Information & General Works 
Philosophy & Psychology 
Religion 
Social Sciences 
Language 
Pure Science 
Applied Sciences 
Art & Recreation 
Literature 
History & Geography